(Ir)religiosity and lexical semantic innovations in Antiphon: Second Tetralogy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17398/1886-9440.19.209Keywords:
Antiphon, Athens, Classical Age, (Ir)religiosity, LexiconAbstract
Antiphon of Rhamnus is an exceptional orator and his contribution to the study of (ir)religiosity in Athens, an aspect of paramount importance in the 5th century BC, is fundamental. In this article, which concerns the Second Tetralogy (a masterpiece in which Antiphon admirably displays his judicial rhetorical skills), we will comment and analyze certain lexical and semantic innovations by our orator which underline Antiphon's originality in the use of relevant aspects for the understanding of the (ir)religious phenomenon in the 5th century BC
Downloads
References
Blass, F., Talheim, Th. (1966 [= 1914]), Antiphontis Orationes et Fragmenta, Leipzig: Teubner.
Calderón Dorda, E. (2015), Esquilo. Tragedias. V. Prometeo Encadenado. Fragmentos de otras tragedias sobre Prometeo, Madrid: Alma Mater.
Decleva Caizzi, F. (1969), Antiphontis Tetralogiae, Milano-Varese: I. E. Cisalpino.
Furley, W. (2021), “Religious Arguments in Antiphon Rhetor”, en Papaioannu, S., Serafim, A., Demetriou, K. (eds), Rhetoric and Religion in Ancient Greece and Rome, Berlin & Boston: De Gruyter, pp. 59-77.
Gagarin, M. (1990), “The Ancient Tradition on the Identity of Antiphon”, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 31: 27-44.
Gagarin, M. (2002), Antiphon the Athenian. Oratory, Law, and Justice in the Age of Sophists, Austin: University of Texas Press.
Gagliardi, L. (2012), “Ruolo e competenze degli efeti da Draconte all’età degli oratori”, Dike 15: 33-71.
Giombini, S. (2023), I delitti e i discorsi. Diritto e retorica nelle Tetralogie di Antifonte, A Coruña: Colex.
Leite, P. G. (2014), Ética e retórica forense: asebeia e hybris na caracterização dos adversarios em Demóstenes, Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
MacDowell, D. M. (1963), Athenian Homicide Law in the Age of the Orators, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Melero, A. (1996), Sofistas. Testimonios y fragmentos, Madrid: Gredos.
Pastor Andrés, H. F. (2015): “Léxico y metáforas agonísticas en el orador Antifonte: nuevas consideraciones”, Studia Historica. Historia Antigua 33: 13-37.
Peels, S. (2015), Hosios. A Semantic Study of Greek Piety, Leiden-Boston: Brill.
Plastow, Ch. (2020), Homicide in the Attic Orators. Rhetoric, Ideology, and Context, London-New York: Routledge.
Ramón Palerm, V. M. (2018), “Actualización Científica”, en Ramón Palerm, V. M., Sopeña Genzor, G., Vicente Sánchez, A. C., Irreligiosidad y literatura en la Atenas Clásica, Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, pp. 21-62.
Vegetti, M. (2008 [= 1999]), “Culpability, Responsibility, Cause: Philosophy, Historiography, and Medicine in the Fifth Century”, en Long, A. A. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 271-289.
Vergara Recreo, S. (2023), Demóstenes vs. Esquines. El léxico irreligioso como estrategia retórico-política, Madrid: Clásicos Dykinson.
Vicente Sánchez, A. C. (2018), “Tragedia”, en Ramón Palerm, V. M., Sopeña Genzor, G., Vicente Sánchez, A. C., Irreligiosidad y literatura en la Atenas Clásica, Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, pp. 65-150.
Vicente Sánchez, A. C. (2021), Sagrado y sacrílego (ὅσιος y ἀνόσιος) en la Tragedia Griega, Madrid: Ediciones Clásicas
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2024-12-19 (2)
- 2024-12-19 (1)
